Rate Las Vegas





      


Jubilee!

Search the Show Guide for Jubilee!

2003 comments about Jubilee!

If you have seen Jubilee!, please ADD your own comment.

Jubilee!
            
Date Seen: 12/03 - Undecided
The show itself was good, that is what we saw of it. We arrived at the Box Office about 1/2 hour before the show. We reserved our tickets months in advance. There were two very slow people working in the Box Office. When we got there, there were two people ahead of us in line. After waiting the 1/2 hour to get our tickets, we went to see the show. We were told we could not go in because the show had started about 15 seconds before we got there. I spoke to the person who said she was the boss. She was rude and insensative. She said they were on time, we should have been. We were. It was Ballys fault we did not have the actual tickets on time. We were let into the show about 15 minutes after the beginning. We paid for the entire show. The way the "boss" handled our problem ruined the whole Jubilee experience for us.
<BeKeGr384 -at- aol.com> - Boulder CO 80302 - Added 12/02/03 - [198.81.26***]    2350

Jubilee!
      
Date Seen: 10/03 - Bad Show
We felt like we were watching Pee Wee's Big Adventure.
<one4racn2 -at- aol.com> - Vancouver WA USA - Added 03/11/04 - [64.12.113***]    2736

Jubilee!
      
Date Seen: 10/03 - Good Show
This was our first trip to Vegas, and we packed in 8 shows while in town, and Jubilee was the best! If you want a taste of classic Las Vegas, this is it. The costumes are fantastic and the sets incredible! We thought it was classy and very entertaining. Would recommend this show to anyone who wants to see a big production number. A beautiful theater with not a bad seat in the house.
<megan -at- gohighspeed.com> - Dayton WA USA - Added 11/06/03 - [64.35.129.***]    2263

Jubilee!
            
Date Seen: 10/03 - Undecided
Had great seats, about 6 feet from the stage. The costumes were fabulous only about 4 people sing, the rest lip synch (rather badly). The dances were a spectacle, the cast was 50/50, half really seemed to be enjoying performing, while the other half were just trying to make it to the end. The "intermission" acts were almost bettr than the show itself. Remember when your buying your ticket your really paying for the spectacel rather than content of the show.
<cristo96 -at- frontiernet.net> - USA - Added 10/22/03 - [67.50.136.***]    2177

Jubilee!
      
Date Seen: 07/03 - Good Show
This was a great show!!! Lots of good entertainment. This was the first show I saw in Vegas and I loved it. Sexy, funny, and entertaining. Worth the price.
<kaya_kanoelani -at- yahoo.com> - Phoenix AZ USA - Added 07/29/03 - [68.3.218***]    1884

Jubilee!

Date Seen: 06/03 - Undecided
I don't think that Donn Arden would allow a show of his to go on for more than 20 years without it being revamped and retooled once and awhile. Jubilee!, while certainly a grand production in the "traditional" Las Vegas show sense, needs a facelift and a tummy-tuck. The dancers especially seemed tired and not very involved, which is a big turn-off for me, as I love live entertainment of this sort.

The producers need to think really big and hard of what they can do to propel this production forward so that it can be viable for another 20 years, because at the present speed, everyone in town will be bored to tears in only 5! Or better yet, Bally's should fire the producers, and bring in Greg Thompson to jazz the place up a bit.

<davidheaton -at- juno.com> - Mount Pleasant IA USA - Added 07/08/03 - [64.136.27***]    1826

Jubilee!
      
Date Seen: 02/03 - Good Show
Since I was a little girl I always wanted to see a Vegas show with the showgirls, fancy costumes, etc. Jubilee was all that I had hoped for. As a former dancer of many years, I felt that the majority of the dancers did a great job and were very talented. There were a few girls that looked like they did not belong on a stage; their timing was off, not quite as technically advanced as the other dancers and it was distracting to me, but probably would not have been noticed to someone without any formal dance training. The specialty acts were very enjoyable. I didn't quite understand the whole "Titanic" number though. There was not much storyline, and it just sort of ended and trailed off... The topless part was a little different at first, but after several minutes, I really did not notice. It seemed quite natual and classy. The best part - no smoking in the theater!
<k_pando -at- msn.com> - San Luis Obispo CA USA - Added 03/24/03 - [64.161.56***]    1408

Jubilee!
      
Date Seen: 01/03 - Bad Show
boring
<chicago18882000 -at- yahoo.com> - USA - Added 01/03/05 - [68.92.36.***]    4863

Comment Disclaimer: No attempt has been made to verify or assure the accuracy of the above comments.
You must judge the truthfulness of any comment and accept responsibility for your use of this information.


[ Return To Referring Page ]

[ Current Jubilee! Comments & Ratings ] [ 2002 & Earlier Jubilee! Comments ]

[ Rate Las Vegas ] [ Las Vegas Online Entertainment Guide ] [ A2Z Las Vegas ]
Charleston Communications


Send this page to a friend
This Web Site Developed And Maintained By Charleston Communications.
Questions or Comments About This Web Site?
E-Mail Webmaster.
Copyright © 1995-2006 Charleston Communications All Rights Reserved  Disclaimer
PHP Code Last modified: January 13 2006 16:18:20.
Search Las Vegas
This page powered by PHP and mySQL!
810 visits (1 today, 1 this week)